The CISI comments on the Budget

Read the CISI's comments on the budget, with further comment from Rebecca Taylor CFPTM Chartered FCSI, CISI Board Director and Managing Director of Aurea Financial Planning

CISI budget comments

In the Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s Budget speech Wednesday 16 March 2016, the CISI was particularly impressed with two initiatives: the change to employer funded advice and the Lifetime ISA.

Employer funded advice
The current position is that employers are only permitted to spend up to £150 per annum paying for advice for employees, otherwise it becomes a taxable benefit in kind. However, quality financial advice requires a thorough fact find of a client’s circumstances and can rarely be provided for £150. The Chancellor increased the threshold to £500 which is much more realistic and an effective acknowledgement that good financial advice is worth paying for.

Lifetime ISA
We also welcome the announcement of a Lifetime ISA for those over 18 but under age 40, which is encouraging this group to save or invest for a first property or for their retirement.

What is especially appealing is:

  1. the quantum that can be saved
  2. the generous 25% uplift, and
  3. that the ISA is available for each individual.

This means that a couple can save a total of £8,000 into an account every year, towards a joint property. This is a significant help to young people so they can save for their own homes.

Rebecca Taylor CFPTM Chartered FCSI comments

We welcome the announcement of a Lifetime ISA for those under age 40, encouraging this demographic to save or invest for a first property or for their retirement. But a Help to Buy ISA is already available and there is no difference between the Government boost in a Help to Buy ISA and Lifetime ISA – they both work out as 25%.

Note that the Lifetime ISA allows a higher amount to be saved each year at £4,000, and can be used to purchase a home up to £450,000 value, whereas a Help to buy ISA is limited to £200 per month after the initial lump sum of up to £1,000, and this is limited to a property of £250,000, except in London where it is £450,000.

Both ISAs are available per person, so a couple can save into an account each and use the combined value to purchase a joint property. Therefore the value of these vehicles depend on how you are expecting to save and how much you are wanting to save.

You can save into both a Help to Buy ISA and a Lifetime ISA, but you can only elect to use one of the pots for the house purchase. Why were the rules for a Help to Buy ISA simply not relaxed and the two types of ISA kept separate? We believe it is unlikely that the Help to Buy ISA will be expanded beyond the existing timeline. The retirement element of the Lifetime ISA has benefits and drawbacks and needs to be compared to saving into a pension scheme.

Which option is best for an individual will depend on the tax rate someone is paying now, and what tax rate they are expecting to pay in retirement.

For young savers this is pure guesswork as we are looking so far into the future! If someone is a basic rate taxpayer and doesn’t have access to a salary sacrifice scheme, the Lifetime ISA may well be a preferred option.

However, if someone is a higher rate taxpayer and can get tax relief on pension contributions at 40%, but expects to pay only basic rate in retirement, along with the 25% lump sum which is tax free, this may well be the best option.
"Of course we need to compare the relative expected fund values and take into account one is partly taxable and the other is tax free!"If we add in employer contributions, then this swings the balance in favour of the work place pension, but an employee paying basic rate tax may want to pay only the minimum required as they do get a higher rebate from a Lifetime ISA.

To complicate things further though, a basic rate taxpayer with access to a pension using salary sacrifice, sometimes known as a salary exchange scheme, will effectively get tax relief on contributions at 32%. The higher the up-front tax rebate/government top up, the faster the funds will grow, but then of course we need to compare the relative expected fund values and take into account one is partly taxable and the other is tax free!

This is unlikely to be a factor for many, but there is another factor to consider, which is that a pension can currently be taken from the age of 55 and the Lifetime ISA from 60.

Lastly, and important for some consumers, is that a pension is written under trust, so is not subject to Inheritance Tax (IHT). A Lifetime ISA will form part of your estate and as such would generally be subject to IHT.

Advantages of the Lifetime ISA are definitely there: self-employed people will probably see the attraction, as will lower earners. It is a shame that it is limited to those that are under 40, as many self-employed individuals will miss out on this. It is unlikely that a Lifetime ISA would be preferable to a workplace pension which includes an employer pension contribution.  

We are concerned that people may not make the most sensible decision. ISAs are generally seen as trustworthy, whereas pensions are not. Owing to the bad press surrounding pensions, some consumers may opt for the Lifetime ISA without thinking about it as an alternative to a company pension scheme.
"More than ever, advice is needed to help people make the best decision that is suitable for their personal circumstances"Those who receive financial planning advice will as always be the ones to benefit most, using a combination of all the available schemes for themselves and their immediate family. More than ever, advice is needed to help people make the best decision that is suitable for their personal circumstances.

In addition, we note a change to employer funded advice: currently if employers spend more than £150 per annum paying for advice for employees, it is a taxable benefit in kind. This is increasing to £500. This will open up the possibility for financial planners to provide far more personal planning advice without the employee being taxed.

Notable in its absence is further tinkering with the pension allowances, and one might think it has been left alone as the Lifetime ISA is the first step to overhauling the pension system entirely to a tax exempt route.  

Also absent is any increase in the IHT threshold. While a complicated measure was announced last year to allow an increase for properties, this should have been widened to be available to all.  

Increases in tax allowances are always welcome. ISA allowances will be increased to £20,000 from 2017, although contributions into a Lifetime ISA will be part of this new increased allowance. A £2,000 increase to the point at which higher rate tax is paid is a significant increase, with the personal allowance increase also steadily rising.  

We would hope that the personal allowance will continue to rise at a higher rate than inflation to hit the £12,000 mark so that untaxed income is enough to pay basic household running costs.

The CISI has organised a Young Money Debate on 6 April 2016 at Cass Business School, ‘Do young people need to change their financial priorities?’, featuring Sophie Robson of MRM, Rohan Sivajoti of Evestor, Scott Moorhouse of 7IM and others.
View event information

Published: 18 Mar 2016
Categories:
  • The Review
  • News
  • Financial Planning
Tags:
  • Employer funded advice
  • Lifetime ISA
  • Budget 2016

No Comments

Sign in to leave a comment

Leave a comment

Further Information